Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0973

reference
234-tree-1
name
0973
tree-preservation-order

undefined

234-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.002620 50.857518)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.002563 50.857512,-1.002566 50.857523,-1.002574 50.857533,-1.002586 50.857542,-1.002602 50.857547,-1.002619 50.857549,-1.002637 50.857547,-1.002653 50.857542,-1.002665 50.857534,-1.002674 50.857524,-1.002677 50.857513,-1.002674 50.857502,-1.002666 50.857492,-1.002654 50.857484,-1.002638 50.857479,-1.002621 50.857477,-1.002603 50.857478,-1.002587 50.857483,-1.002574 50.857491,-1.002566 50.857501,-1.002563 50.857512)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL